Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
Response rates from 374 Australia voters.
75% Yes |
25% No |
75% Yes |
25% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 374 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 374 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZM933G1mo1MO
climate is changing. Adapt like we're meant to do! Stop trying to mess with nature and causing more problems!!!
@9ZLWWTL1mo1MO
No as the earth always changes. I mean how dumb are some of you
@9YLH5TZ 1mo1MO
Yes, if they are also investing in everything else to prevent catastrophic climate change
@9W9Q2D82mos2MO
Yes, but not as the only option to combat climate change.
@9SYC4SQ4mos4MO
Bro, just stop habitat destruction, stop outputting fossil fuel emissions, and stop waste and pollution. These are the most important and proven solutions, not geoengineering.
@9RXQJJ35mos5MO
Yes, but to tread carefully and vote before implementing anything
@9Q529Z26mos6MO
Yes over subsidising climate damaging subsidies and investments. However it must prioritise proven interventions such as nationwide transition to renewable energy (this does not include nuclear or gas).
@9MJK32R7mos7MO
The opponents make a good point that there could be 'unforeseen negative consequences' but, if it was successful it could be very useful in finding solutions for global warming.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
