Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
64% Yes |
36% No |
64% Yes |
36% No |
See how support for each position on “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 76 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 76 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MYFHGP1mo1MO
Climate change is a result of the failures of capitalist logic and ideology. There is no scenario where an economic system based on infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources works. It's objectively a bad system. Marxism-Leninism will solve what capitalism can't, what it refuses to because "it's not profitable"
@9MJK32R2mos2MO
The opponents make a good point that there could be 'unforeseen negative consequences' but, if it was successful it could be very useful in finding solutions for global warming.
Explore other questions that Australia voters are discussing.
