Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.8k Australia voters.

18%
82%

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2WGS2Xanswered…1yr1Y

No, unfertilised gametes should never be considered as a human being. Even a zygote should not be considered a human. A foetus shouldn't be considered a human until the end of the second trimester when the main structures of the central nervous system are mostly fully defined.

 @9PTS7MSanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes and No. They are only 'children' if there is a plan to bring that embryos to full term.

 @B57NYYHanswered…1yr1Y

No; though all forms of human life are to be treated with care and dignity, separate legislation is required for this specific stage of life.

 @peanutsgalleryanswered…1yr1Y

it should be treated with the same care and compassion as if they were still within the ovaries of a woman, and any decisions made should be up to thoes who donated or store the embryos.

 @B3NGC9Nanswered…1yr1Y

No, however they should have protections to be only permitted to be terminated by the biological parent

 @B37G2S6answered…1yr1Y

The stance should be the choice of the people who created the embryos

 @B3WWHTHanswered…1yr1Y

While it can be argued that they are children, due to their limited development, being on par with or less complex then some amoeba, in terms of legality of wrongful death of minors being applied to embryos, they should be excluded, due to the lack of any form of cognative, sensory, or other essential bodily functions present later on in development.