Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.
38% Yes |
62% No |
24% Yes |
54% No |
8% Yes, but only in response to extreme situations |
7% No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
6% Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
0% No, and abolish the police |
See how support for each position on “Demilitarize the Police” has changed over time for 35.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Demilitarize the Police” has changed over time for 35.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9BTY9XW12mos12MO
Yes, but only in extreme situations and with strict training on how to use the equipment
@9LG79672wks2W
Yes, but only in response to extreme circumstances where the people using the weapons have strict training on how and when to use the equipment.
@9KD5WJV2mos2MO
yes, but only in specific circumstances such as an attempted coup or other large scale crimes such as terrorism
@9JXWGCD2mos2MO
yes and no I agree with only with strict training on how and when but also if a higher agency can deal with the ssiue then they should not police
@9CJK2WD10mos10MO
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment and in extreme stances
@9C5RZWZ11mos11MO
Yes, but only to respond to extreme situations and with scrutinous training on how and when to use the equipment.
Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.