The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read moreStatistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 8.1k Australia voters.
70% Yes |
30% No |
57% Yes |
25% No |
9% Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
4% No, fund national and local programs instead |
3% Yes, but decrease the amount |
1% No, it has shown to be ineffective |
0% Yes, and increase the amount |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 8.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 8.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B3XZGQQ1wk1W
Only small amounts but possibly increase amounts once Australia and Australian are in stronger financial positions
@B2ZKPNL1mo1MO
hang klaus shwab and end the World Enslavment Forum stop putting flouride in my water also theyre swiss whuch should tell you enough tbh
@9ZM933G4mos4MO
NO! WHO are a bunch of liars. Get out of all global meetings that are really only about controlling and making money off your populations.
@8WCHYV53yrs3Y
Yes, but they need to be have a regulatory power to achieve anything.
@992LLJK2yrs2Y
Yes, in theory but national and local healthcare needs funding more.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “World Health Organization” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
