The Australian constitution does not currently reference Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The federal government created a council to explore holding a referendum on the subject in May 2017. Proponents, including Prime Minister Turnbull, argue that the original inhabitants of Australia should be recognized in the constitution and all racial elements should be removed. Opponents argue that the government resources should not be wasted on holding a referendum.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 78.6k Australia voters.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 78.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 78.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@593R4MJ4yrs4Y
To be honest, Im sick of recognizing Aboriginal people. this country is going to end up being run by Aboriginals soon and the white man will be a second class citizen. Hell we can't even claim racism when an Aboriginal calls us whiteys or crackers or honky or any racial slur.
@8F6MYPM5yrs5Y
It should mention all people
@4X989LW4yrs4Y
They should recognise all religions and cultures but provide no benefit for any as we are all Australian.
@9727M252yrs2Y
No. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are Australian and therefore they are already recognised. By creating a specific reference, category or any other separation/segregation from being 'Australian' is a form of apartheid.
@Kiceanna4yrs4Y
No, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders are Australian, thus I would argue they are recognized and represented, even if not by name. The constitution doesn't need to change.
@4WPM5BS4yrs4Y
It's important, but a referendum is incredibly expensive to hold. It would be more efficient to actually do something that would provide resources that would actually help someone, and serve more of a purpose than just sit there as a token gesture.
@B4L7FMZ1wk1W
If they are being written to be formally recognised then yes. If you are giving them power to overturn or impact laws via the voice based on outdated and prejudicial treatment from generations ago, then no.
@B4JJCRG1wk1W
Our constitution is a joke not fit to wipe your *** with regardless of who it does or doesn't include.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
