More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Last answered 44 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Australian voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Apr 28, 2016. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Data based on 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Houses should be communally owned and used for human consumption and not profit. 6 years ago from a Green in Lakemba
Yes, but allow negative gearing on newly developed properties. 6 years ago from a Green in Bentley
Maybe suggest a flat rate regardless of your tax bracket so it is more equitable - it is an expense to investment and exists for shares as well as real estate. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Collaroy
Yes but limit the amount that can be geared. For example one property or a $2m uper limit. Or for an income of up to $200,000pa. 6 years ago from a Labor in Kenthurst