Reason Party

Very strongly agree

No, we should provide more funding for renewable energy instead

The Reason Party has a strong focus on environmental sustainability and has advocated for a transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy. Therefore, they would strongly agree with providing more funding for renewable energy instead of CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given their environmental stance and advocacy for renewable energy, the Reason Party would likely agree with not allowing CSG projects in Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more research needs to be done to ensure there is no groundwater contamination

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they would likely agree with the need for more research to prevent groundwater contamination if such projects were to proceed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they would likely agree with the need for increased environmental restrictions and oversight if such projects were to proceed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the projects are far away from residential areas

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they might somewhat agree with the idea of having these projects far away from residential areas if they were to proceed. However, this does not align with their overall stance on environmental sustainability and renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Reason Party has a strong focus on environmental sustainability and has advocated for a transition away from fossil fuels, including coal seam gas, towards renewable energy. Therefore, they would likely disagree with unrestricted CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.