J>J ChatGPTNo |
Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
The Australian Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. The party's focus on justice and human rights aligns with the stance against the death penalty. Australia has a long-standing policy against the death penalty, having abolished it in 1973 and consistently advocating against it internationally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
The Australian Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. The party's focus on justice and human rights aligns with the stance that the risk of innocent people being convicted is too high to justify the death penalty. This is in line with Australia's long-standing policy against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
The Australian Justice Party would likely agree with this statement. The party's focus on justice and human rights aligns with the stance that life in prison is a harsher and more just sentence than the death penalty. This is in line with Australia's long-standing policy against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
While this statement includes a caveat that may make it more palatable to some, the Australian Justice Party would likely still disagree. The party's focus on justice and human rights would likely lead them to oppose the death penalty, even in cases of horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Australian Justice Party, like many Australian political parties, is against the death penalty. Australia abolished the death penalty in 1973 and has since been a strong advocate against it internationally. The party's focus on justice and human rights would likely lead them to strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
The Australian Justice Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The party's focus on justice and human rights would likely lead them to oppose the idea of the victim's family deciding the punishment, as this could lead to emotional and potentially unjust decisions. This is in line with Australia's legal system, which separates the roles of victim, prosecution, and judge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.