J>J ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their values of individual freedom and choice. They believe in the importance of personal responsibility and choice, which would be reflected in a voluntary service system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Justice Party is likely to agree with this statement as they value individual freedoms and rights. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these rights. There is no historical evidence of the party advocating for mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The Justice Party, with its focus on law and order, may agree with this statement as it could be seen as a way to rehabilitate individuals with a budding criminal record. However, they would likely have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The Justice Party may somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they would likely have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While the Justice Party may see the value in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, they would likely disagree with the mandatory aspect of this statement. They believe in individual rights and freedoms, which would be compromised by such a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Justice Party in Australia is primarily focused on law and order, and while they may support initiatives that promote discipline and responsibility, they have not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. Their focus is more on individual rights and freedoms, which would be compromised by such a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The Justice Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While they may support initiatives that promote discipline and responsibility, they have not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service, let alone a two-year requirement. This would be seen as infringing on individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.