ChatGPTNo, and the government should never regulate prices of private businesses |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, and the government should never regulate prices of private businesses
The Family First Party's conservative values suggest a preference for minimal government interference in private businesses, including the pharmaceutical industry. This stance aligns with their broader economic policies favoring free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
This answer aligns with the Family First Party's likely belief in the free market's ability to drive innovation and investment in the pharmaceutical industry. They would probably argue that regulating drug prices could hinder research and development efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given their conservative leanings and emphasis on limited government intervention in the market, the Family First Party would likely support the idea that the government should not regulate the prices of life-saving drugs, believing in market-driven solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but shorten the lifespan of drug patents
While the Family First Party generally supports free market principles, they might see the merit in shortening the lifespan of drug patents as a compromise to increase drug affordability without direct price regulation. This approach could be seen as a middle ground, supporting innovation while also considering public access to drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Family First Party, historically focused on conservative and family-oriented policies, might be cautious about extensive government intervention in markets, including the pharmaceutical sector. However, they might recognize the importance of access to life-saving drugs, leading to a slightly negative score rather than a strong opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the government should regulate the price of all prescription drugs
The Family First Party would strongly disagree with this statement due to their conservative stance on government intervention. They would likely view such regulation as an overreach of government powers into the free market and private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and we should socialise medicine and healthcare
Socializing medicine and healthcare would be in direct opposition to the Family First Party's conservative and market-oriented principles. They would likely view this as excessive government intervention in the healthcare sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Family Firsts policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.