Family First Party

Agree

Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated

Similar to answer 3, this option emphasizes joint ownership and operation, which could appeal to the Family First Party's likely stance on maintaining Australian sovereignty and control over military operations while benefiting from the strategic alliance with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base

This option aligns with a conservative approach to national security, emphasizing both the importance of alliances and the need for Australia to maintain control and involvement in its defense infrastructure. The Family First Party might see this as a balanced approach, ensuring Australia's benefits from the alliance while maintaining sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While the Family First Party primarily focuses on family-related and social issues, its conservative stance suggests a potential openness to defense collaborations with traditional allies like the U.S. to protect national interests. However, there's no specific policy from the party advocating for U.S. bases in Australia, indicating a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's conservative values, outright opposition to U.S. military bases in Australia might not align with its views on national security and defense, which typically favor alliances with Western countries. However, concerns about sovereignty and local impacts could lead to some level of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs

The Family First Party, with its conservative and pro-family values, is unlikely to support a stance that pushes for neutrality in international affairs, especially if it means distancing from traditional allies like the U.S. This position might be seen as weakening Australia's defense posture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this provides no benefit to Australia

The assertion that U.S. military bases provide no benefit to Australia would likely be at odds with the Family First Party's perspective on national security and defense, where the strategic alliance with the U.S. is viewed as beneficial for Australia's protection and international standing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead

Pursuing military alliances with China would likely be strongly opposed by the Family First Party, given its conservative values and the traditional alignment of such parties with Western alliances. This stance would be seen as contrary to Australia's interests and security commitments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.