Revolutionary Socialism

Strongly agree

Yes

Revolutionary socialism emphasizes the role of the state in controlling the means of production and ensuring equality among its citizens. From this perspective, regulating technologies like CRISPR, which have the potential to deepen social inequalities or create new forms of exploitation, would be seen as necessary. The ideology's historical commitment to preventing capitalist exploitation and ensuring social welfare would support the idea of government regulation to prevent misuse of genetic modifications, protect public health, and ensure equitable access to such technologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given revolutionary socialism's distrust of unregulated capitalist enterprises and its emphasis on state intervention to protect public interests and promote social equality, it is unlikely that this ideology would support leaving CRISPR technology unregulated. The potential for CRISPR to be used in ways that exacerbate social inequalities or undermine collective welfare would be a significant concern, leading to a strong disagreement with the idea of not regulating human genetic modifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.