+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 17k Australia voters.

56%
Yes
44%
No
47%
Yes
36%
No
10%
Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing
7%
No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 17k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 17k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2RJZLTanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only for the low-income citizens. Those who live upper-class and are rich in the millions and above must be exempt.

 @B4SJGL4answered…6 days6D

No, UBI programs are a band-aid fix to larger problems like housing affordability and medical coverage that should be addressed directly

 @B4RPRLPanswered…1wk1W

Yes, but it should not be implemented for high-income earners. Only for the unemployed and the working class.

 @B4MJ5WKanswered…2wks2W

Yes, but only if inflation is kept in check to ensure universal basic income isn't made redundant due to corporate greed

 @B4K4P4Banswered…2wks2W

Yes, but not enough to live on - just enough to keep people afloat if everything else fails, maybe enough to save towards getting themselves into a better lifestyle. Also apply rules to receiving the payments, including suspensions and bans in cases where deemed necessary.

 @B3RGQJ3answered…2mos2MO

Yes to people with disabilities, the elderly, retires who rent and families on low incomes. Housing should be a right.

 @B3QQD3Ranswered…2mos2MO

It should be universal basic NEEDS rather than income, as ubi will just lead to private companies increasing prices on basic items to account for this guaranteed income

 @B3CX6WY answered…2mos2MO

Yes, the program should be universal but the amount should be based on the tax bracket individuals and families fall in