+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 486 Science Party voters.

53%
Yes
47%
No
40%
Yes
37%
No
14%
Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing
10%
No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 486 Science Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 486 Science Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Science Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9X3YRHRanswered…3wks3W

if we don't raise the minimum wage, yes. or at least some form of UBI. I do believe wage benefits are more beneficial but UBI is good at providing a security net or consider freidman's negative income tax

 @9WNJ2H2from Virginia  answered…4wks4W

I really don't have a strong view on this. I'd have to read studies from where it's already been implemented and see how it went. I like the idea of a safety net for everyone, but I'm really unsure of how much it would cost and whether we'd see low income earners quit their jobs in droves as it wouldn't be worth it for them to work 40 odd hours per week for what may end up very little difference in income.

 @9V79F4Wanswered…2mos2MO

Trial UBI in areas with a below average income, and monitor its effects on poverty and employment, if it reduces poverty and doesn't have a significant negative impact on employment, try to introduce it elsewhere

 @9V4RPLJanswered…2mos2MO

Yes but only if the money was required to be spent on food or australian resources, to support the current economy.

 @9TQPHWXanswered…2mos2MO

The repairs do you support covering foods supply any economic necessary as said government feedback admins

 @9TQ6P2Fanswered…2mos2MO

Trial UBI in certain locations, like those with a low average income, and see its effect on poverty and employment rates

 @9T6575Janswered…3mos3MO

Test the program in particular areas (such as areas with lower income) and if it has a positive effect, try to introduce it more widely

 @9DDBFK5answered…1yr1Y

It would depend on level of privatisation of utilities and healthcare, as well as how this would change welfare system