+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 233 2601 voters.

23%
Yes
77%
No
15%
Yes
73%
No
8%
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
3%
No, too many people are innocently convicted
0%
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
1%
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 233 2601 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 233 2601 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 2601 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JGMPJFanswered…1yr1Y

No, because nothing gives the right for a human being to decide whether another human being lives or dies

 @9J46KB2answered…1yr1Y

Only in very rare cases, when there is undeniable proof from a years-long investigation. Too many innocent people suffered from the death penalty.

 @9JR2TMZanswered…1yr1Y

no, for the sake of life. Also the truth are sometimes found after the death and there is no going back

 @B389DS7answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only for sexual violence offenders committing acts of sexual assault on adults, children and animals

 @B2QDW8Wanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only for those who have been found guilty and been convicted for sex-related crimes (such as rape, sexual assault, child sexual abuse, repeat sex offenders).

 @B2HZNL3answered…2mos2MO

Allow the criminals to choose. If they do not wish to have the death penalty, put them in a prison where they must care for their own well being. E.g, grow their own food, cook their own food, make products for themselves. If they didn’t wish to conform to society’s basic values then they can live in different one, where they are monitored and treated.

 @B2BFNPWanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, and it should be used for all first degree murders, or any crimes committed by an non white immigrant

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.