+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.9k Melbourne voters.

32%
Yes
68%
No
20%
Yes
63%
No
11%
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
3%
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
0%
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
2%
No, too many people are innocently convicted

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k Melbourne voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k Melbourne voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Melbourne voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JGMPJFanswered…10mos10MO

No, because nothing gives the right for a human being to decide whether another human being lives or dies

 @9J46KB2answered…10mos10MO

Only in very rare cases, when there is undeniable proof from a years-long investigation. Too many innocent people suffered from the death penalty.

 @9JR2TMZanswered…10mos10MO

no, for the sake of life. Also the truth are sometimes found after the death and there is no going back

 @9WQCZRQanswered…4wks4W

Yes, but with very strict regulations. Should only be for repeat offenders of horrific crimes, and without doubt have committed the crime and show no remorse.

 @9D67HJZanswered…1yr1Y

For heinous crimes remove human rights and send to forced labour camps for the term of their natural life to repay society.

 @8ZFQ6X6answered…3yrs3Y

No, no one should be able to take another persons life. Murder and the death penalty are basically the same.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.