+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 37.4k Australia voters.

34%
Yes
66%
No
23%
Yes
62%
No
10%
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
3%
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
0%
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
2%
No, too many people are innocently convicted

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 37.4k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 37.4k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JGMPJFanswered…1yr1Y

No, because nothing gives the right for a human being to decide whether another human being lives or dies

 @9JR2TMZanswered…1yr1Y

no, for the sake of life. Also the truth are sometimes found after the death and there is no going back

 @9J46KB2answered…1yr1Y

Only in very rare cases, when there is undeniable proof from a years-long investigation. Too many innocent people suffered from the death penalty.

 @B4PBNFQanswered…1wk1W

No, as there are many people who are wrongly convicted of crimes, but they should receive life in prison with no parole.

 @B4JJCRGanswered…2wks2W

Yes but only for continuous re-offenders who the appropriate medical/mental health professionals agree cannot be rehabilitated. (IE: Uncle bob who's first trip after being released from prison every time has been his meth-dealers house. After the 5th repetition of this pattern, too bad Bob, you're not worth the harm you cause to others.)

 @B4F2DXZanswered…3wks3W

No, ostracism to prison islands should be reinstated instead, where inmates should provide for their own survival, and public investment should be restricted to preventing escapes

 @B389DS7answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for sexual violence offenders committing acts of sexual assault on adults, children and animals