Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 3.8k Balmain voters.
83% Yes |
17% No |
75% Yes |
14% No |
4% Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
2% No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
4% Yes, and provide more free public transportation |
1% No, we have more important issues that need funding |
0% No, and we should privatize more public transportation services |
|
0% No, and we should reduce current spending |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.8k Balmain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.8k Balmain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Balmain voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B27XB5T 2mos2MO
I think there should be a 3 level subsidy scheme. Welfare recipients & students, minimum wage earners, rich people. Maybe they could have a system that works similar to rent control.
@B3HF3QJ6 days6D
Yes if it goes towards more efficient services such as the fast train to help link Australian cities
@B39CPKJ2wks2W
Yes, but it must go towards greatly improving efficiency, safety and coverage and value across the board
@B2RP6KD1mo1MO
Yes in suburban and rural areas. City areas already get plenty of funding, there are not enough stops in suburban areas.
@B2R3CYM1mo1MO
Yes but for the money to go to region and rural areas. The cities have enough public transport facilities while the country has next to zilch
@B2QYN5X1mo1MO
Financially no. The amounts, Keep it simple, low and environmentally friendly. This answer goes for Buses, Train, Tram, Ferry.
@B2LTGYW1mo1MO
No, existing spending should be redirected from lesser used bus routes to trains, to reduce the cost of trains.
@9ZR2LN53mos3MO
Our public transport system is clunky and should be handed over to a state owned corporation to improve efficiency
Join in on the most popular conversations.
