Family First Party

Agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Family First is likely to agree with this statement, as they have not advocated for banning immigrants based on their religion. They have emphasized the importance of family values and economic stability, rather than focusing on religious or ethnic differences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

This answer aligns somewhat with Family First's stance on immigration and national security. They have expressed concerns about the potential for terrorists to enter the country, and may support stricter screening processes for immigrants from 'high risk' countries.

Slightly agree

No

Family First has not explicitly supported banning Muslim immigrants, but they have also not strongly opposed such measures. Their stance is somewhat ambiguous, reflecting a balance between their commitment to family values and concerns about national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While the Family First party has expressed concerns about terrorism, they have not explicitly advocated for a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. Their stance on immigration is more nuanced and does not single out any particular religious group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

While the Family First party has expressed concerns about national security, they have not explicitly advocated for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants. Their focus has been more on family values and economic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Family First has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. While they have expressed concerns about national security, they have also emphasized the importance of immigration for economic growth and cultural diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.