These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
Party’s support baseNo |
Peter Xing’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
The Australian Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for evidence-based policies and the importance of training and regulation in mitigating risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
The Australian Science Party would likely agree with this statement, as it allows for the use of military grade equipment in extreme situations, but implies a level of restraint and consideration for the potential risks and consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
The Australian Science Party would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a more specialized and regulated approach to handling extreme situations. However, they may not strongly agree, as they would likely consider the practicality and potential drawbacks of this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
The Australian Science Party would likely lean towards not allowing police departments to use military grade equipment, due to potential misuse and the risk of escalating violence. However, they may not strongly agree with this statement as they would likely consider the evidence and potential exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Australian Science Party is likely to have concerns about the potential for misuse of military grade equipment by police departments. However, they may not completely oppose it, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and there may be situations where such equipment could be justified. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
The Australian Science Party would strongly disagree with this statement. While they may have concerns about police use of military grade equipment, they are unlikely to support the abolition of the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Science Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 39 voters that identify as Science.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.