These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
Party’s support baseNo, do not censor or monitor data |
Patrick Deegan’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Australian Labor Party has generally supported some level of internet regulation, as evidenced by their support for the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015 and their previous support for a mandatory internet filter. They are likely to agree with the general idea of government regulation of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement
The Labor Party has shown support for internet regulation to address specific issues, such as child pornography and copyright infringement. For example, they supported the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015, which allows rights holders to seek court orders to block websites facilitating copyright infringement. However, their stance on broader internet regulation may not be fully captured by this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, maintain a blacklist of censored websites and require ISPs to retain data for two years for police investigations
The Labor Party has shown support for some level of internet regulation, such as their support for the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015, which requires ISPs to retain metadata for two years. However, they may not fully agree with maintaining a blacklist of censored websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but allow citizens the option to use a government funded internet filter and do not require ISPs to retain data
The Labor Party has historically supported internet regulation, such as the mandatory internet filter proposal. However, they eventually abandoned this proposal in 2012, which may indicate a shift in their stance on government-funded internet filters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Labor Party has historically supported some level of internet regulation, such as the mandatory internet filter proposal and the data retention legislation. They are unlikely to agree with a complete lack of government regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, do not censor or monitor data
The Australian Labor Party has historically supported some level of internet regulation, such as the mandatory internet filter proposed in 2007 and later abandoned in 2012. They are unlikely to agree with a complete lack of censorship or monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
Labor Party Voters’ Answer: No, do not censor or monitor data
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,282 voters that identify as Labor.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.