Nathaniel Smith

Strongly agree

Yes

The Liberal Party of Australia has historically advocated for fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, and reducing government debt. For example, during the Abbott and Morrison governments, there was a strong emphasis on reducing deficits and controlling public sector borrowing. The party's economic platform generally favors smaller government and lower public debt, though they may not always pursue aggressive austerity, hence not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Liberal Party would largely disagree with the idea that the government should not reduce public sector borrowing. Their policy history, including the 2014 and 2019 budgets, shows a preference for reducing deficits and limiting government borrowing, often criticizing Labor governments for higher debt levels. While they may allow for increased borrowing during crises (e.g., COVID-19), their general stance is against sustained high public sector borrowing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.