Discussions
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6mos6MO
Yes
No
@9SHG6V6answered…3mos3MO
Yes, but only in cases where more housing should be built
@9RKZCVBanswered…4mos4MO
Yes, in order to make sure welfare supplements, not replaces, a working income.
@9PDPBQYanswered…5mos5MO
No, but increase accountability and do not encourage irresponsible borrowing.
Show more replies
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…6mos6MO
These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to…
▲ 9818 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…10mos10MO
▲ 7034 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued multiple apologies after making a controversial remark during Question Time, where he referenced Tourette's syndrome to mock a member of the opposition. The comment has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with disability advocates…
▲ 96 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone…
▲ 2.1k34 replies
