Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Environmental

Ian Goodenough’s policy on geoengineering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

  Party’s support baseYes

Ian Goodenough’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

Yes

The Liberal Party of Australia, traditionally conservative and market-oriented, has shown a mixed approach to climate change and related technologies. While historically less aggressive in pursuing climate change mitigation compared to more progressive parties, they have supported technological and market-based solutions to environmental issues. Funding research into geoengineering, which can be seen as an innovative technological solution, aligns with their general support for technological advancements and market-based solutions to societal challenges. However, their commitment might be tempered by concerns over the economic impacts and regulatory implications of such technologies, as well as potential public skepticism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Liberal Party has demonstrated a cautious approach to climate change, outright opposition to funding geoengineering research is unlikely. Their historical support for technology and innovation in addressing societal challenges suggests an openness to exploring geoengineering as part of a broader strategy for climate change mitigation. However, their support may be conditional, focusing on the economic viability, potential for private sector involvement, and the regulatory framework surrounding geoengineering projects. Thus, while not fully supportive, they are unlikely to strongly oppose funding research into geoengineering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 16hrs ago

Party’s support base

Liberal Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 91 voters that identify as Liberal.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here