Regulating AI involves setting guidelines and standards to ensure AI systems are used ethically and safely. Proponents argue that it prevents misuse, protects privacy, and ensures AI benefits society. Opponents argue that excessive regulation could hinder innovation and technological advancement.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 223 Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party voters.
71% Yes |
29% No |
71% Yes |
29% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 223 Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party voters.
Please login to unlock historical data statistics
Trend of how important this issue is for 223 Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party voters.
Please login to unlock historical data statistics
Unique answers from Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B44DXFK2wks2W
Yes, but only to ensure a mandatory minimum percentage of human employees a business must have before resorting to AI.
@B3XZGQQ2wks2W
It depends what kind of AI as it can be extremely useful but for AI that has the potential to take jobs then yes.
@B3TZ7VF3wks3W
Yes, and ban the use of AI in creative industries to protect such industries like art and filmmaking.
@B2JNTXF2mos2MO
The government should ban generative AI (like ChatGPT) it’s a hazard to the environment and is making people stupid
@B2DNDWQ3mos3MO
Yes, but not excessive, only tailored towards preventing misuse, protecting privacy and ensuring benefits to society
@9ZNM6WK4mos4MO
AI should only be regulated when it comes to large corporations and business. Individuals who use AI for personal use should not be regulated
@9YLN53C5mos5MO
A separate board or party should be the ones to regulate AI, whilst AI needs regulation, I do not believe that to be the government's role.
@9RJF2VJ8mos8MO
No, because AI does not have as much common knowledge as people
Join in on the most popular conversations.
