Try the political quiz
+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.2k Australia voters.

92%
8%

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BF27F9Nanswered…3 days3D

Depending on the suburb and its location relative towards major polution centres.

 @B8ZNFNFanswered…6mos6MO

No but this should be controlled for the greater area to ensure such spaces are in proportion to population requirements

 @B4SJGL4answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but mandated spaces should instead be wildlife corridors and undeveloped land, in order to facilitate native life

 @B4RNT9Canswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but residential allotments should be large enough to allow for yard space as well instead of putting profits above livability by cramming as many allotments in as they can at a premium price.

 @B4GTKPNanswered…1yr1Y

Studies show human beings benefit greatly from being around nature immediately and in the long term. It is a balance between practicality and finances but yes, when applicable they should.

 @B3ZGKXZanswered…1yr1Y

No, new developments should be required to contribute financially to road infrastructure projects that support the increased traffic.

 @B3CKLNKanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if there is no green spaces nearby, their doesn't need to be a park and/or oval in every housing estate

 @B32D8FKanswered…1yr1Y

They should also provide enough space for passive solar design, to make it possible to build sustainable houses.

About This Data

Based on 3.2k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should new housing developments be required to include green spaces and parks?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 17, 2026, from https://australia.isidewith.com/poll/5139206624

Embed The Live Result

Preview