Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State Electorate
Suburb
Postcode
Response rates from 2.6k Australia voters.
92% Yes |
8% No |
92% Yes |
8% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4GTKPN2wks2W
Studies show human beings benefit greatly from being around nature immediately and in the long term. It is a balance between practicality and finances but yes, when applicable they should.
@B3ZGKXZ1mo1MO
No, new developments should be required to contribute financially to road infrastructure projects that support the increased traffic.
@B3CKLNK2mos2MO
Yes, but only if there is no green spaces nearby, their doesn't need to be a park and/or oval in every housing estate
@B32D8FK2mos2MO
They should also provide enough space for passive solar design, to make it possible to build sustainable houses.
@9SYC4SQ8mos8MO
PUBLIC (government-funded and community-built) HOUSING ONLY. ABOLISH PRIVATE PROPERTY (private development for houses is now just another investment, housing is no longer treated as a vital human right).
@9SWQZYB8mos8MO
No, incentivise high density living and protect existing nature instead
Join in on the most popular conversations.
