Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Response rates from 2.2k Australia voters.
91% Yes |
9% No |
91% Yes |
9% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4B9G5P2wks2W
Purchase should not be banned, but ownership of properties purchased by foreign investors should not be recorded in public registries, nor recognised by the courts.
@9VTCDFB6mos6MO
Yes, max 2 houses per investor per state unless they are using it for commercial purposes
@9VRJ67Q6mos6MO
Yes, depending on what the property is for. (e.g.. business or housing)
@9VRGQBL6mos6MO
yes they should only be able to bey if their planning to live in it
@9VPK8PD6mos6MO
We should place a large tax on the purchase of residential properties by foreign investors and interstate investors.
@9VRBZQX6mos6MO
Yes, but allow only max 2 houses per a person/company per state. Exception: if it is actively being used for legal commercial uses.
@9VPSQ9X6mos6MO
Requires limitation to protect the abnormal market fluctuation by financial stance differences
@9TQ5HHD7mos7MO
Yes, but only for FDI (foreign direct investment) to protect housing for locals.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
