+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 230 Left voters.

83%
Yes
17%
No
81%
Yes
15%
No
1%
Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation
1%
No, tax carbon emissions instead
1%
No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead
0%
No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 230 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 230 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9WBCNY8answered…2mos2MO

No, but consider tax incentives for R&D projects independently address as viable with investing in

 @9V4LVQRanswered…3mos3MO

 @9SYC4SQanswered…4mos4MO

“ Carbon capture is not effective by itself, and especially not under capitalism where its very reason for existence of infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources is unsustainable. Carbon capture should be a method used, but not the only one. It should work in conjunction with other methods of combating climate change. And it starts by destroying the thing that's destroying the earth... that being capitalism, and replace it with Marxism-Leninism, achieved through class struggle.” = thanks to eloquent comment.

 @9QZJSXKanswered…6mos6MO

 @9MYFHGPanswered…7mos7MO

Carbon capture is not effective by itself, and especially not under capitalism where its very reason for existence of infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources is unsustainable. Carbon capture should be a method used, but not the only one. It should work in conjunction with other methods of combating climate change. And it starts by destroying the thing that's destroying the earth... that being capitalism, and replace it with Marxism-Leninism, achieved through class struggle.