Try the political quiz

11 Replies

 @B38QHJYanswered…2wks2W

No, tax emissions and invest in reforestation and land rehabilitation for environmental gain instead

 @B346JKPanswered…3wks3W

Yes but only if these companies are not using it to continue extracting and burning fossil fuels

 @B2WPBG9Greenanswered…4wks4W

It depends. 'Developing' a technology could be used as a dodge if they have no intention of doing anything with it. But if they're actually implementing it, then yes.

 @B2KWFG6from Kuala Lumpur  answered…1mo1MO

 @9WBCNY8answered…5mos5MO

No, but consider tax incentives for R&D projects independently address as viable with investing in

 @9V4LVQRanswered…6mos6MO

 @9SYC4SQanswered…6mos6MO

“ Carbon capture is not effective by itself, and especially not under capitalism where its very reason for existence of infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources is unsustainable. Carbon capture should be a method used, but not the only one. It should work in conjunction with other methods of combating climate change. And it starts by destroying the thing that's destroying the earth... that being capitalism, and replace it with Marxism-Leninism, achieved through class struggle.” = thanks to eloquent comment.

 @9QZJSXKanswered…8mos8MO

 @9MYFHGPanswered…10mos10MO

Carbon capture is not effective by itself, and especially not under capitalism where its very reason for existence of infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources is unsustainable. Carbon capture should be a method used, but not the only one. It should work in conjunction with other methods of combating climate change. And it starts by destroying the thing that's destroying the earth... that being capitalism, and replace it with Marxism-Leninism, achieved through class struggle.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...