Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 140k Australia voters.
46% Yes |
54% No |
31% Yes |
54% No |
15% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 140k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 140k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MYFHGP11mos11MO
No, animals react differently to humans on most medications so not only is it unethical to the animal, it's ineffective for the human.
@8RLTJCF4yrs4Y
Yes but only rats or mice
@9F9VNPV2yrs2Y
Yes, so long as there is no harm done to the animals that the tests are being done to.
@997LC632yrs2Y
No, unless there are no viable alternatives
@B4KZQCD1wk1W
no cosmetics should not be used on animals. animal testing should only be for medicines and treatments that will prevent human death and suffering. animal testing should ensure no animals suffer during
@B4BNS472wks2W
Yes but only if there is no viable alternative and it's been approved by a medical oversight panel and state and territory governments.
@B484M583wks3W
No, it has been proven that computer models predict safety better than animal testing, and animals that are tested on lack the same anatomy or responses that humans have, so animal testing is useless.
@B3S5GRB1mo1MO
People who commit charges such as murder (not in self defence), and child molestation charges should be used instead.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
