Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 3.6k Watson voters.
17% Yes |
83% No |
14% Yes |
79% No |
3% Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
2% No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
2% No, it should be raised |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.6k Watson voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.6k Watson voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Watson voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@99HMQV62yrs2Y
Yes, optional from 16, then mandatory from 18
@9LPVW7R7mos7MO
No, and voter should be required to pass a basic test demenstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. However, there should be free public accessibility to information, and it should not be biased, but instead made so that people who are competent of the outcomes of their elections can vote.
@9V79F4W2mos2MO
Yes, it should be optional to vote for 16- and 17-year-olds, and those younger who have a job should be able to apply to vote
@99P72YW2yrs2Y
Anyone should be able to vote of they wish, but voting shouldn't be compulsory, or should be via topics not parties.
@8WYQ8B53yrs3Y
This should be restricted to the heads of each household.
@8NZTRGW4yrs4Y
No, it should be raised to 25 and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote
@9ZR2LN54 days4D
No, there shouldn't be voting or democracy in the first place and the monarchy should have all of the power or direct it to the Governor general
@9ZPK3386 days6D
Yes, allow people between the ages 16 and 17 to optionally vote, and let those younger with a job to apply to vote
Join in on the most popular conversations.