Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 1.1k 5000 voters.
31% Yes |
69% No |
16% Yes |
66% No |
7% Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
3% No, funding should come from their members |
6% Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount |
|
2% Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
|
1% Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k 5000 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k 5000 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from 5000 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9WBCNY81mo1MO
Yes, but only if political donations are banned and there is greater regulation of lobbyists and advertising
@9VWZ23C1mo1MO
a combination of they get the same amount of money and there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money.
@9RSXS5H4mos4MO
Funding should be split up dependant on votes so the next party in will get funding to help promote the new ideology
@9JLHV4D10mos10MO
All parties get a set amount of funding ideally less than $1 million to work with from the government
@8ZPC7K43yrs3Y
Funding should be both proportional to the amount of votes and transparent in their use
@93GJJHJ2yrs2Y
Depends, if they are on the verge of collapse and want to keep their party, then the government can give money. Also add restrictions on how they spend it, and the amount given scales to the number of their votes.
@92Z7Y9Q3yrs3Y
Yes, if they receive same amount and not a top up to parties that have wealthy business who already donate
@92WKVQK3yrs3Y
Only if every party receives equal amounts
Join in on the most popular conversations.
