40%
Yes
60%
No
16%
Yes
57%
No
17%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
3%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 86k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 86k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.

 @92WKVQKanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92VKWTVanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92GK5YQanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but they should only be able to be used in court if a warrant has been obtained.