In 2012 the government implemented a dental plan that would allocate $4 billion in funding through 2018. The program will provide dental services to children, Medicare recipients and low income adults who live in rural areas.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 891 Protectionism voters.
82% Yes |
18% No |
78% Yes |
18% No |
4% Yes, but only for children and senior citizens |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 891 Protectionism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 891 Protectionism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Protectionism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@4XC6S944yrs4Y
More important to control what people eat. Tax sugar and junk food
@4VX9G3D4yrs4Y
Why should we fund laziness? Dental hygiene is a choice, just like taking a shower
@4T7QBXQ4yrs4Y
Yes, but only in cases of birth or genetic defects, not in cases of rot from poor self-care.
@4WDTFMZ4yrs4Y
People only need dental care because of western processed diet. Flouride and fillings are so bad for you
@4WRQK9R4yrs4Y
I thought fluoridating our water aimed at this, however, high sugar diets and childhood consumption of too much sugary drinks have reversed preventative dental care. Tax the sugary drinks.
@B4BSKMW17hrs17H
This can create a lack of confidence in the general public’s health! The wealthy would have the best access to healthcare while the rest of society will be left with bad quality health professionals
@9LP9GNK12mos12MO
Yes, but only with strict diagnostic criteria and auditing of dentists to ensure that they don’t over-treat.
@9DF9MJT2yrs2Y
Yes for children and students to age20
Join in on the most popular conversations.
