Try the political quiz

Palmer United policy on boat immigrants

Topics

Should Australia accept asylum-seeking boat immigrants?

  ChatGPTNo, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and temporary protection visas

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and temporary protection visas

This answer aligns closely with the United Australia Party's stance on asylum seekers. They have advocated for turning back boats and processing asylum seekers offshore, with hard security checks and temporary protection visas, as a way to deter people smuggling and protect Australia's borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The United Australia Party has been vocal about their support for stricter immigration policies, including turning back boats and processing asylum seekers offshore. This stance aligns with their broader policy platform of protecting Australia's borders and national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and no temporary protection visas

While the United Australia Party supports offshore processing and hard security checks, they have not explicitly opposed the use of temporary protection visas. However, their overall stance on strict immigration control suggests they might be somewhat agreeable to this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, they should be treated the same as those arriving by air

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on treating boat arrivals the same as those arriving by air. However, given their support for strict border control and opposition to onshore processing of boat arrivals, they would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The United Australia Party has historically supported stricter immigration policies and has been critical of the government's handling of asylum seekers arriving by boat. They would likely disagree with a blanket acceptance of asylum-seeking boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, do not turn back boats and process them onshore

The United Australia Party has consistently opposed onshore processing of asylum seekers arriving by boat, arguing that it encourages people smuggling and poses a threat to national security. They would strongly disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

United Australia Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 288 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.