Public statementsYes |
Palmer United answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “An extra $4 billion will be provided for mental health services and $5 billion for Aboriginal health as part of the funding pack...” ‐net.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Agree
Yes
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its stance on mental health funding. However, given its general support for healthcare and welfare, it is likely that they would support increased funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its stance on mental health funding. However, given its general support for healthcare and welfare, it is likely that they would support increased funding for mental health research and treatment, especially if it leads to a higher quality of care and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue. However, given their general support for healthcare and welfare, they might agree with increasing funding for personalized care, but their stance on subsidizing pharmaceutical companies is unclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead
The United Australia Party has shown support for private sector involvement in various areas, but they also support government intervention in healthcare. Therefore, they might not fully agree with leaving mental health research and treatment entirely to private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The United Australia Party, while not explicitly stating their stance on mental health funding, generally supports healthcare and welfare. Therefore, it is unlikely they would oppose increased funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.