United Australia Party

Strongly agree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

This answer aligns well with the UAP's pro-business and free market principles. They would likely agree that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success, without government-imposed caps on their bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The UAP generally supports free market principles and less regulation on businesses, including banks. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of capping bankers' bonuses, as it could be seen as an unnecessary interference in the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Australia Party (UAP) has not explicitly stated a position on capping bankers' bonuses. However, given their general pro-business stance, they might moderately agree with this as a means of curbing excessive bonuses, but would likely not strongly support such a regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

While the UAP might agree with some regulation on bankers' bonuses, a cap as low as 50% would likely be seen as too restrictive and against their free market principles. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

The UAP, with its pro-business and free market stance, would likely strongly disagree with such a drastic cap on bankers' bonuses. This would be seen as excessive regulation and interference in the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

The UAP would strongly disagree with this answer. The idea of nationalising banks goes against their free market principles and their belief in minimal government interference in the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.