Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Criminal

Palmer United policy on demilitarize the police

Topics

Should police departments be allowed to use military grade equipment?

  ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment

This answer aligns with the United Australia Party's general stance of supporting law enforcement while also recognizing the need for responsible use of power and resources. The party would likely agree with the idea of strict training to ensure responsible use of military grade equipment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in response to extreme situations

The United Australia Party might agree with this statement as it balances the need for law enforcement to have the necessary tools to maintain order, while also acknowledging the potential risks and abuses of such equipment. However, without explicit statements from the party, this is a tentative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated their stance on police departments using military grade equipment. However, they generally support law enforcement and maintaining order, which could imply a potential agreement with this statement, but not a strong one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

The United Australia Party might somewhat agree with this statement as it suggests a specialized, higher agency to handle extreme situations, which could align with their support for strong and effective law enforcement. However, without explicit statements from the party, this is a tentative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the United Australia Party's general support for law enforcement, it is unlikely they would strongly agree with completely disallowing police departments from using military grade equipment. However, without explicit statements, this is a tentative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish the police

The United Australia Party would strongly disagree with this statement. The party supports law enforcement and the idea of abolishing the police would be in direct opposition to their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1hr ago

Party’s support base

United Australia Party Voters’ Answer: No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 103 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.