Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

Considering the party's emphasis on meritocracy and equal opportunity in the context of rural and outdoor activities, they might slightly agree with this statement, as long as it pertains to fairness and equal standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Given the party's lack of public stance on military gender roles, there is no clear evidence to suggest a strong agreement or disagreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural issues, firearms regulation, and land management. Their public statements and policies do not extensively cover military or gender equality issues, making it difficult to predict a strong stance on this topic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The party's platform does not heavily focus on anti-discrimination policies, especially in the context of military service, making it challenging to assess their position on this matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

While the party does not explicitly discuss physical capabilities in combat roles, their general advocacy for equality and merit-based assessment might lead them to mildly disagree with this blanket statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

Although the party does not specifically address military sexual assault, their general lack of focus on gender-based discrimination issues suggests a mild disagreement with framing combat roles primarily through the lens of sexual assault risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

There is no specific evidence to suggest that the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party holds a view that men would compromise missions to protect women. This statement might be contrary to their broader principles of individual responsibility and capability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.