Try the political quiz

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on immigrant assimilation

Topics

Should immigrants be required to learn English?

  ChatGPTYes

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not explicitly stated a position on language requirements for immigrants. However, given their focus on rural and regional Australia, they may see the value in immigrants learning English to better integrate into these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

The SFF has not explicitly stated a position on this issue. However, given their focus on rural and regional Australia and their support for government services, they may agree with the idea of the government providing free language learning courses for immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

The SFF has not explicitly stated a position on this issue. However, given their focus on rural and regional Australia, they may see the value in immigrants learning English and the removal of multilingual translations could be seen as a way to encourage this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country

The SFF has not explicitly stated a position on this issue. While they may appreciate the diversity immigrants bring, their focus on rural and regional Australia suggests they may also see the value in immigrants learning English to better integrate into these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

The SFF has not explicitly stated a position on this issue. However, it is unlikely they would support the removal of multilingual translations without also supporting some form of language learning for immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the SFF has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, it is likely they would disagree with this statement. The party's focus on rural and regional Australia suggests they may see the value in immigrants learning English to better integrate into these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 200 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.