Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Strongly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. Their focus is on supporting rural and regional Australia, and they would likely prefer funds to be allocated to national and local programs that directly benefit these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

The party might agree with this statement as it aligns with their focus on local and national issues. Reducing funding to international organizations could potentially free up more resources for domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

The party might lean towards not funding the World Health Organization as their focus is more on local and national issues. However, they have not explicitly stated this as a policy, hence the score is not strongly in agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The party might agree with this statement as it suggests a fair distribution of funding based on what other countries contribute. However, as their focus is more on local and national issues, they may still prefer funds to be allocated domestically. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The party has not made any explicit statements regarding the effectiveness of the World Health Organization, so it is unclear how strongly they would agree or disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on issues related to rural and regional Australia, including hunting, fishing, and farming rights. While they may not be completely against funding the World Health Organization, it is not a priority for them, and they may prefer funds to be allocated to local and national programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

The party is unlikely to support increasing funding to the World Health Organization as it does not align with their primary focus on rural and regional issues within Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.