ChatGPTYes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated
The SFF party would likely support a jointly owned and operated base as it would ensure Australia's involvement and control in the operations. This aligns with their focus on Australian sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base
The SFF party would likely support a joint Australia/U.S. base as it would ensure Australia's involvement and control in the operations. This aligns with their focus on Australian sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. However, they generally support policies that enhance Australia's security and sovereignty. The presence of U.S. military bases could be seen as a strengthening of Australia's security alliance with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs
While the SFF party supports Australian sovereignty, they are not known for advocating neutrality in international affairs. They would likely see the presence of U.S. military bases as a strengthening of Australia's security alliance with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The SFF party is unlikely to oppose the presence of U.S. military bases outright, as they generally support policies that enhance Australia's security and sovereignty. The U.S. is a major security ally of Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this provides no benefit to Australia
The SFF party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that enhance Australia's security and sovereignty. The presence of U.S. military bases could be seen as a strengthening of Australia's security alliance with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead
The SFF party is unlikely to support pursuing military alliances with China over the U.S. The U.S. is a major security ally of Australia and the SFF party generally supports policies that enhance Australia's security and sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.