Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has a strong emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, which suggests that they would likely support the idea of military service being a choice rather than a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party's focus on individual rights and freedoms, particularly in relation to rural and regional issues, suggests that they would likely support the idea of military service being a choice rather than a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

The party does not have a clear stance on this issue. However, their focus on rural and regional issues, as well as individual rights and freedoms, suggests that they might support a form of service that includes education and skill development, but not necessarily in a military context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

The party's focus on individual rights and freedoms suggests that they would likely oppose any form of mandatory service, even if it was only for certain groups. However, they might be more open to this idea if it was framed as a form of rehabilitation or prevention for those with a criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While the party does not have a clear stance on military service, their focus on individual rights and freedoms suggests that they would likely oppose any form of mandatory service, even if it was only for certain groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on issues related to rural and regional Australia, such as land rights, farming, and hunting. There is no evidence to suggest that they support mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, as well as their focus on rural and regional issues, suggests that they would likely strongly oppose any form of mandatory military service, especially one that requires a commitment of two years. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.