Try the political quiz

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on environmental regulation

Topics

Should the government increase environmental regulations on businesses to reduce carbon emissions?

  ChatGPTNo, and the current government is over-regulating businesses

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the current government is over-regulating businesses

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has consistently argued that the government is over-regulating businesses, including those in the farming, fishing, and shooting industries. They believe that these regulations hinder economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party has a history of opposing increased regulations on businesses, including those related to environmental concerns. They believe that such regulations can negatively impact industries like farming, fishing, and shooting, and hinder economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, just enforce existing regulations

The party generally opposes increased regulations on businesses, but they might agree with the idea of enforcing existing regulations. They believe in balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation, and enforcing existing regulations could be seen as a part of this balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

The party might agree with this statement as they have shown support for alternative energy production in the past. However, their primary focus is on reducing regulations on businesses, so they might not fully agree with the idea of providing more incentives for alternative energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

While the party might support the idea of providing more incentives for alternative energy production, they generally oppose increased environmental regulations on businesses. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and I believe global warming is a natural occurrence

While the party opposes increased environmental regulations, there is no clear evidence to suggest that they deny the human contribution to global warming. Their focus is more on balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally opposes increased regulations on businesses, including those related to environmental concerns. They believe in balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation, often siding with industries like farming, fishing, and shooting which can be negatively impacted by such regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 944 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.