ChatGPTYes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight
This answer aligns well with the party's stance. They support resource extraction industries but also advocate for environmental protection and the rights of landowners. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing CSG projects but with increased environmental restrictions and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as the projects are far away from residential areas
The party has a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners, which includes ensuring that resource extraction projects do not negatively impact residential areas. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing CSG projects as long as they are far away from residential areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party generally supports resource extraction industries, including coal seam gas, as they believe these industries are important for regional economies. However, they also have a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners, which may temper their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more research needs to be done to ensure there is no groundwater contamination
While the party supports resource extraction industries, they also have a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners and the environment. Therefore, they may agree with the need for more research to ensure there is no groundwater contamination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, we should provide more funding for renewable energy instead
While the party does support renewable energy, they also believe in the importance of resource extraction industries for regional economies. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of banning CSG projects in favor of funding renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The party is generally supportive of resource extraction industries, including coal seam gas, as they believe these industries are important for regional economies. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 116 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.