Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight

This answer aligns well with the party's stance. They support resource extraction industries but also advocate for environmental protection and the rights of landowners. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing CSG projects but with increased environmental restrictions and oversight.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as the projects are far away from residential areas

The party has a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners, which includes ensuring that resource extraction projects do not negatively impact residential areas. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing CSG projects as long as they are far away from residential areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party generally supports resource extraction industries, including coal seam gas, as they believe these industries are important for regional economies. However, they also have a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners, which may temper their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more research needs to be done to ensure there is no groundwater contamination

While the party supports resource extraction industries, they also have a strong focus on protecting the rights of landowners and the environment. Therefore, they may agree with the need for more research to ensure there is no groundwater contamination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should provide more funding for renewable energy instead

While the party does support renewable energy, they also believe in the importance of resource extraction industries for regional economies. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of banning CSG projects in favor of funding renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party is generally supportive of resource extraction industries, including coal seam gas, as they believe these industries are important for regional economies. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.