ChatGPTNo, a more cost effective solution should be developed such as fibre to the node |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, a more cost effective solution should be developed such as fibre to the node
The party may agree with a more cost-effective solution such as fibre to the node, as they often advocate for fiscal responsibility. However, they would also want to ensure that this does not compromise the quality of the service, especially for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, focus on a wireless solution instead
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may agree with focusing on a wireless solution, as this could potentially provide more accessible and affordable internet connectivity for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, a national high-speed fibre optic network is crucial for the future of Australia's economy
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party would likely agree with the importance of a national high-speed fibre optic network for the future of Australia's economy, especially considering the needs of rural and regional communities. However, they may have concerns about the cost and implementation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not explicitly stated their position on the National Broadband Network, they generally support initiatives that improve services for rural and regional Australians. However, they may not fully agree with the current level of investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
The party is likely to disagree with completely stopping investment in the National Broadband Network as they understand the importance of connectivity for rural and regional Australians. However, they may advocate for a review of the current spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this should be privatised
While the party supports private enterprise, they may disagree with the complete privatization of the National Broadband Network as they would likely have concerns about the potential impact on service quality and accessibility for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.