Public statementsYes |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “The loading of livestock for export must be moved to the outer harbour at Kwinana. Livestock export from other ports such as Alb...” ‐org.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, exports are crucial to the farming industry
The SFF party strongly supports the farming industry and understands the economic importance of exports. They would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their advocacy for the rights and interests of farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The SFF party would likely agree with allowing live exports as it supports the farming industry. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party also advocates for responsible and ethical farming practices, which could potentially be compromised with unrestricted live exports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, allow exports to countries which enforce animal cruelty laws
While the SFF party supports the farming industry, they also advocate for responsible and ethical practices. Therefore, they might agree with allowing exports to countries which enforce animal cruelty laws, but this is not their primary concern compared to supporting the farming industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The SFF party would likely disagree with this statement as it goes against their support for the farming industry and the economic importance of live exports. A ban on live exports could negatively impact farmers, a key constituency for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, ban all live exports
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is a political party in Australia that represents the interests of farmers and rural communities. They would likely disagree with a complete ban on live exports as this could negatively impact the farming industry, which is a key constituency for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 128 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.