Try the political quiz

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on high speed rail

Topics

Should the federal government invest in the construction of a high speed rail?

  ChatGPTYes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states

The party might agree with this statement, as a cross country system linking all states could potentially benefit rural and regional areas by improving connectivity. However, their support would likely depend on the details of the proposal and how it would impact rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but possibly later when it's affordable

The party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they are generally pragmatic and might support the idea of a high speed rail if it was affordable and beneficial to rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party might somewhat agree with the federal government investing in the construction of a high speed rail, as it could potentially benefit rural and regional areas by improving connectivity. However, their primary focus is on issues directly related to shooting, fishing, and farming, so this is not a key issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, if it is a Hyperloop

The party has not made any specific statements about the Hyperloop, so it's unclear whether they would support this or not. Their support would likely depend on the details of the proposal and how it would impact rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only linking major western cities

The party has not made any specific statements about linking major western cities with a high speed rail, so it's unclear whether they would support this or not. Their support would likely depend on the details of the proposal and how it would impact rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

The party might somewhat disagree with this statement as they generally support infrastructure development that benefits rural and regional areas. However, they might also be concerned about the cost and whether it would divert resources from other priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.