Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Immigration

Science’s policy on boat immigrants

Topics

Should Australia accept asylum-seeking boat immigrants?

  Public statementsYes

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes

Reference: “increase Australia’s humanitarian intake in proportion to other migration schemes" "Close all Australian offshore immigration d...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, they should be treated the same as those arriving by air

The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this approach, as it aligns with their stance on equality and humanitarian treatment of immigrants, regardless of their mode of arrival. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, do not turn back boats and process them onshore

The Science Party would likely agree with this approach as it aligns with their humanitarian stance on immigration. However, they may also support some form of security checks, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Science Party, while not having a specific policy on boat arrivals, generally supports a humanitarian approach to immigration. They would likely agree with accepting asylum seekers, but the score is not a full 5 as they may also support security checks and processing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and temporary protection visas

While the Science Party may agree with security checks and processing, they may not agree with turning boats back at sea and processing them offshore, as this could be seen as a less humanitarian approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Science Party is generally supportive of immigration and humanitarian efforts, so they would likely disagree with outright rejecting asylum-seeking boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and no temporary protection visas

This approach is likely to be strongly disagreed with by the Science Party, as it involves turning boats back at sea, processing them offshore, and not providing temporary protection visas, which could be seen as a harsh and non-humanitarian approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 17hrs ago

Party’s support base

Science Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 93 voters that identify as Science.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.