Science Party

Very strongly agree

No, we should provide more funding for renewable energy instead

The Science Party would strongly agree with this statement. They have a clear policy focus on promoting renewable energy and reducing Australia's reliance on fossil fuels, including coal seam gas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, more research needs to be done to ensure there is no groundwater contamination

The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They advocate for evidence-based policy and would likely support further research into the potential environmental impacts of CSG projects before they are allowed to proceed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Science Party would likely agree with this statement, as they have a strong focus on environmental sustainability. However, they may not fully agree without the context of promoting alternative, renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight

While the Science Party would likely agree with the need for increased environmental restrictions and oversight, they may not fully support CSG projects due to their potential environmental impact and their preference for renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the projects are far away from residential areas

While the Science Party would likely agree with the need to keep CSG projects away from residential areas, they may not support the projects in general due to their potential environmental impact and their preference for renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Australian Science Party is known for its strong stance on environmental issues and its commitment to renewable energy. They would likely disagree with unrestricted CSG projects due to the potential environmental impact, including the risk of groundwater contamination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.